| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Commerce Dept. Replies to House Members' ICANN Salvo
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 6 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
It appears that Commerce is doing its job. Give them a break.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
|
|
I personally don't get too excited about this letter. If you were in charge of the Commerce Dept. why would you give hostages to fortune? Important Congresspeople write to you, you send a civil and non-binding reply. The interesting question isn't who drafted this letter - it's a basic bureaucratic place-holder - but rather when/whether there will be Congressional hearings, or even action. And th3e answer to that may well not be known until we see what ICANN comes up with.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
