| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Commerce Dept. Replies to House Members' ICANN Salvo
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 6 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I generally refrain from opining as to matters for which I have no support, but I feel compelled to pose a question here.
Is the DoC in ICANN's back pocket?
ICANN's arrogance and disregard of public opinion and congressional questions leads me to believe that it has assurances from the DoC of its survival. ICANN does not act in accordance with the wishes of the global Internet community, nor does it follow the recommendations of its own supporting organizations. ICANN simply acts by the wishes of its management, apparently without fear of losing its government contract.
Do you think Don Evans's staff has ties to Joe Sims or Louis Touton?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
