| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
How the New TLDs Can Go from Failure to Success
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 19 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Actually, I use blind type-ins quite a lot, but then I'm usually trying .co.uk first which greatly reduces the risk of accidently linking to a porn site, and is always a good bet for a UK-based company. If that fails I will probably try .com, and then hit a directory-based search engine, such as (but not necessarily) Yahoo.
I'm also hooked into the "inclusive/alternative/rebel alliance" root rather than the "official/legacy/US government" root, and I'm yet to see any useful domains that I might want to visit.
My own personal view is both of unlimited TLDs as there's no technical reason not to, and that "Internet keyword" searching will replace the less-friendly domains in the long run, which also means that one company will dominate the search engine space by their sheer pressence in the web browser space. No clues.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
