| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
WorldCom's down -- and Cerf's up
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 40 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
when DoC announced publicly last fall that it was "unlikely" that transfer of the root-server system to ICANN would take place, everthing else related to the MoU stopped in its tracks (such as continued fostering of competition). ICANN then started down this path of "reformulating" itself to basically get to the same place as if it had the root server system under its control (and the hammer that comes with it). If my take here is indeed the motivation behind ICANN's actions, is this a breach of its fiduciary responsibility? I do not find the timing of a "case for reform" and DoC's announcement of retaining control of the root server system as mere coincidence. Just my opinion, unconstructive or otherwise.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: WorldCom's down -- and Cerf's up
by RFassett
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
