| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
ICANN At Large sites hacked, embalmed
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 8 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I have a general respect for a lot of the things you say, so I don't want to argue over this.
In trying to understand where YOU are coming from, I'd be interested to know how you think "ICANN hijinks" are best dealt with? And also, what form of representation of the general public you think would be best (if indeed you think the public should be represented at all which I better not presuppose)?
If the status quo is bad, what can make it better?
Richard Henderson
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|