ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Survey of Usage of the .BIZ TLD | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 20 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Survey of Usage of the .BIZ TLD
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday June 24 2002, @09:51PM (#7439)
    User #2810 Info
    No, my prediction could include new players, but yes, restricted in the sense that we will see, if any at all, only restricted TLDs (that is, more restricted than the supposedly open .biz, even if they were policing their restrictions, and perhaps more restricted than the restricted TLDs of the first round), and probably sponsored vs. unsponsored (see ICANN here regarding the terms), though ICANN will still attempt to dictate and control the sponsors' policies.

    And no, I don't think that is illegal in my country, which happens to be Canada at any rate. Speaking of countries though, with ICANN at best continuing its glacial pace on new TLDs, the ccTLDs will have time to mature and grow, and as ICANN's blueprint does them few favors (I only spell like I'm in the US), I can see greater impetus than ever for the ccTLDs to go it on their own. That is, create a root of all the ccTLDs, or those signing on, then add ICANN's gTLDs (and those ccTLDs not signing on) as an afterthought, but only if they play nice. I don't see this happening any time soon, but it doesn't have to if ICANN is going nowhere fast. ccTLDs are generally far more responsive to their own communities than ICANN is to the global community, I think getting more involved in the issues of one's own ccTLD, both to the extent that its governance allows it, and via one's national government, is a Good Thing. Stronger ccTLDs can help to slow ICANN (and its gTLDs) excesses. This is true of privacy, dispute resolution, marketing tactics, consumer protection, and a host of other concerns that may be at odds with ICANN's US-centric worldview.

    M. Stuart Lynn has stated that ICANN is not a democracy. Some of our countries still are and we'd better use it or lose it. ICANN was deserving of a chance to run a global meritocracy, rough consensus and running code. Well, there is no rough consensus, the code would run regardless, and ICANN has shown itself to be entirely bereft of merit. The experiment is over, that patient is dead, putting more energy into it just causes involuntary twitches, leaving a zombie to lurch and flail about. Think global but act local. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com