| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Reform Plans
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 23 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
"This is a long way from suggesting the BoD reject some bids solely because they explicitly state they intend to make donations."
Agreed. But, given the Board did make the comments that it did, then some applicants may have been influenced to "cut-out" Good Works as part of their application (I can see how an applicant might reason to do so). When these applicants now see that others are going down this path with their applications, the ones that did not must feel obligated to bring it to light so as not to evolve into a competitive disadvantage. So, Bret Fausett says "DOA". Otherwise, should an entity that proposed Good Works become the eventual winner, is there any way of removing the idea that the Good Works entered into the decision? Would applicants that "cut-out" Good Works (based upon sound reasoning of what was said by the Board)want to go back and change their application? This what I mean by ICANN making the same mistakes again by allowing subjectivity into the equation unless they do Bret's "DOA" or pick an application that did not include Good Works (making the point moot). I can see ICANN stating that it will not consider "Good Works" in making its determination but they said (or perhaps inferred) that measures of Good Works might lead to placing the stability of the .org registry at risk vs. otherwise. In looking at the statements made by the Board in this light (the stability card) I can see why an applicant would completely exclude these kind of measures and, if others did, make sure everyone else understood the point.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|