|
Reform Plans
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 23 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
WIRED.com has a short story on ICANN's statement.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
ICANN sure will feel blue very soon
Sure, it will be in print - but not their blueprint
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
I think the companies who weren't selected to run new top level domains should sue ICANN.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
Bret Fausett's blog site actually praises the domain tax.
Bret has either started to work for ICANN, is being paid to say these things by a .ORG applicant, or has been murdered and his blog site taken over by Dave Crocker and Kent Crispin.
Someone should drop by his house and make sure he's still alive.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Fausett
by
Anonymous
on Saturday June 22 2002, @04:06PM (#7386)
|
|
|
But seriously.
What has happened to Bret Fausett? It's not just this one issue, but almost everything for the past few months.
Bret has gone from an astute critic of ICANN to one of their most rabid supporters.
Honestly, it's as if he's typing whatever Dave Crocker or Kent Crispin tell him to.
Is it just me?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mind paying a tax on each domain I buy. However, ICANN must open the books so all can see the "need" rather than the "greed".
Condition #2, get rid of the boardsquatters. I don't want my tax dollars paying for a boardsquatters business class airfare to Botswana, Ghana, Sinagpore, or Las Vegas.
Condition #3, Hans Kraaijenbrink must go, period. I'd happily pay a huge tax to see him booted out on his ass.
Condition #4, if I haven't already made myself clear, Hans Kraaijenbrink must go. What? I already said that? I guess I really mean it!
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
