| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Reform Plans
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 23 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
There is a big difference between NEED based funding and a guaranteed revenue source. Work expands to fit the funds available. I'd rather a system where ICANN had to justify its claims for funds, rather then just get more because there are more registrations. Or, should it come to that, too little if there were too few.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: Reform Plans
by michael
|
|
|
|
|
|
If every portion of funding has to be approved and if the funding comes through registrars and registries (even though it, at least in part, comes from the registrants), you are giving a lot of power to registries and registrars. I understand ICANN's need for a stable source of revenue -- which of course has to be need based. But doing NPR pledge drives every year is simply not a solution.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
