ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN Responds to Auerbach | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN Responds to Auerbach
    by Anonymous on Thursday April 18 2002, @01:12PM (#5883)
    There is something ghastly to hide.

    If Karl gets to see the books, he'll know what it is. ICANN, or more accurately the staff, doesn't want that.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Responds to Auerbach
    by Anonymous on Friday April 19 2002, @02:32AM (#5889)
    Karl had a chance to follow procedures and refused to do that. His only goal is to breach his duty of loyalty to the corporation and make public information that he would not otherwise be able to release. Go ICANN.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: icann could be another Anderson?
    by Anonymous on Friday April 19 2002, @03:30AM (#5894)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Responds to Auerbach
    by Anonymous on Friday April 19 2002, @03:42AM (#5895)
    I find it absolutely extraordinary and quite distasteful that ICANN's lawyers should attempt to use the fact that one of it's directors voted with his conscience and free will on Board resolutions in Ghana as a way to "expose" Auerbach. This is tantamount to saying that if oyu do not toe the line you cannot be on the board. It is unbelievable. I quote from ICANN's response -

    "Throughout the meeting,
    the Board members worked hard to reach consensus positions, and ultimately versions of all ten
    resolutions were passed. In the end, no director other than Auerbach voted against any of the ten
    consensus resolutions; he cast opposing votes to five of them. Auerbach abstained on two of the
    other five."

    How on earth can this be relevant to the petition at hand? I sincerely hope that the Californian courts look beyond the rhetoric and expose how corrupt and pathetic the efforts of ICANN's staff to control proceedings are.

    Jones Day are paid more in legal fees to sevice an organisation with a staff of 14 in a quarter than the whole of the ITU spends on legal fees in a year.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com