ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    A Genuinely Non-Profit and Open .org | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 24 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Afilias & ISOC will do a great job if they win
    by Anonymous on Tuesday June 18 2002, @06:24AM (#7246)
    If Afilias and the ISOC are assigned .org, they will do a great job and manage the TLD very well. They have worked hard to cover all the bases. I think people will be pleasantly surprised.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Afilias & ISOC will do a great job if they win by Anonymous
    Re: Afilias & ISOC will do a great job if they win
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Tuesday June 18 2002, @08:01AM (#7249)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    I think you're a troll.

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Afilias & ISOC will do a great job if they win
    by Anonymous on Tuesday June 18 2002, @09:43AM (#7250)
    Peter obviously has a beef with Afilias, but the ISOC-Afilias bid will be strong and if assigned to them, will operate smoothly. Good luck to them.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Afilias & ISOC will do a great job if they win
    by Anonymous on Tuesday June 18 2002, @03:14PM (#7253)
    Afilias, while it has had troubles, has done a fine job dealing with sunrise registrations. In fact, its sunrise procedure has become the model (or the lesson, depending on your view) by which all other sunrise procedures will be judged (and there will be other sunrise procedures at some point). Afilias has been much, much more responsive in dealing with registrations that are clearly in violation of its registry agreement and rules, unlike .name, which continues to do absolutely nothing about squatters like Adrian Miles.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      Re: Afilias & ISOC will do a great job if they win
      by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Tuesday June 18 2002, @05:14PM (#7256)
      User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
      Comparing a magnitude 8 earthquake with an accidental nuclear meltdown does not change the fact that both will spoil your evening.

      ++Peter
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      Afilias has done a fine job dealing with sunrise r
      by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday June 18 2002, @07:26PM (#7258)
      User #2810 Info
      You can't be serious. It is still a helluva mess. Most people probably don't even know that the so-called LR2 (landrush 2) is going on at the moment. LR2 is made up of names that were fraudulently claimed in sunrise. Except that it isn't all .info names that were fraudulently claimed in sunrise, some of those are still being adjudicated, so there may or may not be a LR3.

      Meanwhile there are widespread reports (on the ICANN forum that M. Stuart Lynn says has been offtopic on new TLD evaluation but for three posts) of registrars not accepting LR2 applications from the public who will nevertheless submit applications, presumably for certain preferred clients, or for warehousing. What happened to first come, first served?

      Only someone watching all this on a regular basis and understanding much of the process (speculators and cybersquatters would be most likely to fit the bill) would have any chance of understanding what is going on, and even some of them seem confused. This isn't a fine job, it's a con job. -g

      [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com