Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN Hearing Reactions | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 12 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    UK DTI Seeks Last Minute Feedback for Investigatio
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday June 14 2002, @02:42AM (#7169)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    The UK Government is asking Internet businesses and users to submit their views on the future of the Internet's co-ordinating body, ICANN, by 14th June

    The wide-ranging consultation includes the curiously phrased question of whether the reformed organisation should be a "thick" or a "thin" body. But with the stability of the domain name system at stake, the future of ICANN is a serious matter.


    ICANN is an independent non-profit corporation based in the US which co-ordinates certain technical functions, for example, the assignment of IP addresses, on which the Domain Name System ("DNS") is based. It took over this function in 1998 from the US Government and prior to that the DNS was managed on an ad hoc basis by a network of researchers and technical organisations. In February of this year, an announcement was made by ICANN's President stating that the organisation in its present form was not working. That announcement called for "deep and meaningful" reform of the organisation, and initiated an international consultation process.

    What is at stake?

    ICANN performs a unique and pivotal role in the management and stability of the Internet. Although its workings may seem remote from the day-to-day needs of most businesses, all who rely on the Internet have an interest in its successful operation.

    To be more precise, ICANN's stated mission is the "effective management and co-ordination of those few, higher -- level elements of the Internet's naming and address allocation systems that require or benefit from global management and co-ordination".

    ICANN's key technical functions include: managing the DNS root zone files (essentially, the master list of top level domain names (TLDs); recognising the Country Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs); allocating blocks of IPv4 and IPv6 (next generation) internet addresses; maintaining registries of protocol port and parameter numbers; selecting new generic TLDs and registry operators; and supervising administration of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy, introduced in 1999 and very popular.

    Because of their importance, the control of these technical functions has wider public policy implications for issues like competition, privacy, security and consumer protection. It should also be stressed that these questions are not new, having been aired four years ago when ICANN was formed.

    The key questions

    ICANN's February proposal flagged the areas for reform as being the structure, the funding (and staffing) of the organisation, and its mission. Following on from this, the questions raised in the current DTI consultation document include:

    should ICANN be a "thick" organisation, dealing with wider functions such as consumer protection, or a "thin" organisation, dealing only with a restricted number of technical functions?
    what changes should be made to the structure of ICANN?
    how should ICANN be funded in the future?
    how should public policy issues relating to the DNS -- like security, privacy and competition -- be addressed?
    what should national governments' involvement in the DNS be?
    what should be ICANN's functions in relation to ccTLDs?
    how should global TLDs be managed?
    how should the Root Server System (which underpins the DNS) be managed and funded?
    how should IP address allocation be handled?
    what enforcement powers (e.g. contractual and/or statutory) should ICANN have?

    Next steps

    It is true that the consultation is directed mainly at those with direct involvement with ICANN, such as domain name registries and ISPs. However, some of these issues do have a more direct impact on ordinary businesses -- like domain name dispute resolution policies -- and the UK Government has therefore thrown the consultation open to the entire UK Internet community.

    Businesses and Internet users have until 14th June to submit their responses to the DTI. ICANN's Board will meet at the end of June to discuss the reform and is expected to implement any changes by the end of 2002.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Link for DTI Last Minute Feedback
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday June 14 2002, @02:50AM (#7170)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com