ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Did Neustar Try to Shaft Competing Roots? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 20 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Did Neustar Try to Shaft Competing Roots?
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Wednesday March 27 2002, @07:54AM (#5583)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    I think they have a valid point insofar as they point out the non-robustness of having fewer and less-widespread nameservers for .us. On the other hand, their complaint about the servers being within .biz, and thus unreachable by people who have configured their systems to use an "alternate" .biz instead, is just unjustified whining. Anybody who sets up a server to use names that aren't part of the official Internet is at risk of having parts of the Internet become inaccessible if any of the divergent namespace gets used in the real Internet. For instance, if I set up an intranet containing a host foo.bar.baz, then if some day the .baz TLD gets created for real and somebody else sets up a host foo.bar.baz, perhaps making it an important name server needed to access other sites, then I'm going to have trouble accessing it, and it's my fault for using a name that could get stepped on by a real name later on.

    Even though various alternative versions of .biz (there are at least two of them) existed before Neulevel's one, they had no official status, while Neulevel's has been granted a place in the official Internet namespace (regardless of whether you like or hate Neulevel or ICANN).
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Did Neustar Try to Shaft Competing Roots?
    by trademarklawyer on Wednesday March 27 2002, @08:02AM (#5584)
    User #3282 Info
    Knowing Neustar as I do, I think they are simply trying to leverage the investment made in .biz. I doubt they even considered if alternate roots would be impacted. (these alt roots are not on their radar screen)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    OpenNIC is in the same boat.
    by Undecided on Wednesday March 27 2002, @12:10PM (#5595)
    User #3285 Info
    They took a vote on which .biz to accept last year. I wonder what they'll do about this.

    (I'm not too broken up over this, personally, since I've never had reason to look at a site in either .biz gTLD. So far, both .biz's are full of junk.)

    By the way, the link to ORSC paper isn't working. Somebody fix that! I want to read it, damn it!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • link by fnord Wednesday March 27 2002, @12:34PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com