| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
VeriSign acquires eNIC
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 24 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
The U.S. Government (nor ICANN) shouldn't have anything to do with the ccTLD's. These should be the reposibility of the relevant government, or an organisation acting on their behalf.
What is ridiculous is the way the ccTLD's are being sold globally because they look nice e.g. dot-tv.
Besides, I think the other seven G8 nations might object to the "...run from someone's basement..." argument. I'd much rather have a dot-co-dot-uk rather than a dot-com, firstly, they're slightly cheaper, and secondly have nothing to do with Verisign or the UDRP.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: VeriSign acquires eNIC
by Muhhk
|
|
|
| 2 replies beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
