| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Cavebear meets stonewall
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 36 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Nothing in the Bylaws of ICANN can override California law. But the reluctance of ICANN staff to accept the implications of the word "absolute" in the statute on directors' right of inspection is similar to their reluctance to accept the implications of the words "maximum extent feasible" in the Bylaws on transparency. A major reason for my reconsideration request on the .aero agreeemnt is to get the Board to deal with the "maximum extent feasible" clause in the Bylaws. So far as I know, the meaning of this important clause has never been discussed by the Board.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| - 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
| | 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
