Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN Closes Most Popular Comment Forum | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 58 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN Closes Most Popular Comment Forum
    by Richard_Henderson on Thursday March 21 2002, @08:24AM (#5481)
    User #3269 Info | http://www.atlarge.org/
    Thanks Dan

    I see what you're saying now.

    Anyway, I'm not posting anymore on my methods / use of domains - but thanks for your advice.

    What concerns me is the issues that have gone unexplained and unanswered.

    In answer to an earlier thread, if I was Vint or Stuart's attorney, I would tell them to shut up and say nothing about these issues.

    But the fact remains that that isn't open and transparent governance.

    They should have NOTHING to hide or stay silent about.

    They and ICANN should be working in openness and dialogue in the interests of the worldwide public, and they should disclose ALL ICANN's financial details, and they should disclose ALL transactions and discussions to ALL their Directors, and notify Directors of meetings in good time, and they should uphold contracts, and police their implementation (calling them in if broken), and they should cease to give accreditation to registrars who have broken the rules, acted fraudulently and deceived the consumer.

    In short, ICANN should exist for the worldwide internet public, and NOT for itself, or for the community of registrars with whom it colludes and interacts.

    ICANN should not be opaque. It should be transparent.

    Fred Upton's subcommittee on telecommunications and the internet would do well to question the lack of openness, and lack of day-to-day accountability. It should also question why ICANN has left unexplained so many aspects of the New TLD roll-outs, and the concerns over flimsy Sunrise procedures, and the concerns over conflicts of interest which saw Afilias executives and directors break the very rules they agreed to in the first place. They should also get some administrative staff to analyse the detail of the Public Forum recently closed...

    ...because they will discover documented breaches of trust, and a clear record of ICANN's failure to intervene or respond to fair and reasoned concerns.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN Closes Most Popular Comment Forum by Richard_Henderson

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com