| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN Closes Most Popular Comment Forum
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 58 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
If these are intended to be noncommercial sites for commentary and information, why use .com addresses? Wouldn't .info or .org be more appropriate?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: ICANN Closes Most Popular Comment Forum
by dtobias
|
|
|
|
|
"Commonsense dictates that if you want to put the spotlight on a person, you go straight for their .com!"
...if you want to imply that your site is trying to make money off of that person, that is.
There actually are a few UDRP decisions that imply that the panelists are sometimes more willing to accept the legitimacy of the use of somebody's name in a domain for the purpose of commentary or criticism when it's in a TLD that doesn't imply that it's a commercial site.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | | 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
