ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Auerbach v. ICANN - The Lawsuit | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 16 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Auerbach v. ICANN - The Lawsuit
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Monday March 18 2002, @08:47AM (#5368)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    About time.

    I have often thought that there must be some serious skeletons in the closet at ICANN, and that it would take a lawsuit's discovery phase to uncover them. Thankfully, in this case, the relief being requested are those documents in the first place.

    Now, perhaps, we'll find out how ICANN spent the millions from the rigged TLD application process.

    Now, perhaps, we'll find out how much ICANN has spent on expensive trips.

    Now, perhaps, we'll find out how much ICANN has given JDRP.

    Now, perhaps, we'll find out how ICANN's accounting has been cooked.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Auerbach v. ICANN - The Lawsuit
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday March 18 2002, @10:25AM (#5372)
    User #2810 Info
    Coverage from Reuters, Newsbytes, ZDNet. Earlier coverage on ICANNWatch of Karl's attempts to see the records. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Auerbach v. ICANN - The Lawsuit
    by alan on Monday March 18 2002, @01:18PM (#5377)
    User #2877 Info
    This is a wonderful illustration of why we need independently elected At-Large representatives. Thank you Karl!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Auerbach v. ICANN - The Lawsuit
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday March 18 2002, @09:29PM (#5385)
    User #2810 Info
    Michael writes:
    ICANN CEO Stuart Lynn sought, amidst an amazing series of delaying tactics, to impose all sorts of extraneous conditions on this right.
    While I don't doubt this is true as far as it goes, I think there's more to the story. Karl says he's been asking for the records since December 2000, M. Stuart Lynn didn't join ICANN until mid-March 2001. It may be a mistake to ascribe too much of this to Lynn, just as it may be a mistake to think Lynn's roadmap to reform plan is wholly the work of its putative author.

    I think Lynn was hired largely because he has that hail fellow well met suave affability so well inculcated by the British public school system (in which, as with ICANN Newspeak, public means private). He is the gladhanding point man, but what he is selling comes from Joe Sims, Louis Touton, and a few of the unelected Board members (BTW, does anyone know who was on the hiring committee that chose Lynn?). However, this also means he can be used as the fall guy if it looks like the whole house of cards is about to collapse, or knocked over as Dave Farber, Peter Neumann and Lauren Weinstein have just suggested. Putting too much blame on Lynn just means the existing jokers will be shuffled around and redealt to us as a new hand. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ? v. ICANN - The Lawsuit(s)
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Saturday June 08 2002, @09:39PM (#7020)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    Karl Auerbach is, from what I have read, a right-on kinda guy who stands up for the common people and 'small man' when people abuse their rights and are clearly and evidently biased in favo(u)r of big business (specifically, corporate America.)

    We (specifically myself as the representative of ANNO DOMINI 2000) are also now suing ICANN, as well as the National Arbitration Forum, UDRP Case Panel (for blatant failure to either endorse or police their own Rules and Policies) and also America Online (USA), Incorporated (for trademark abuse and anti-competitive practice.)

    Good luck Karl!

    Together we can change ICANN drastically, but we must stick together to fight for radical changes, or else we must insist that ICANN is replaced with a Democratic, Fair, Non-Profit, Internet-User based organisation...
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 6 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com