ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    UDRP ruling in VIVENDIUNIVERSAL SUCKS.COM dispute | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 21 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    The People to THANK for the UDRP
    by Anonymous on Saturday November 17 2001, @06:04PM (#3712)
    http://www.icann.org/minutes/minutes-24oct99.htm

    WHEREAS, in preparing implementation documents the President, staff, and counsel received valuable insights and advice from a small drafting committee consisting of J. Scott Evans, A. Michael Froomkin, Kathryn A. Kleiman, Steven J. Metalitz, and Rita A. Rodin;

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: UDRP ruling in VIVENDIUNIVERSALSUCKS.COM dispu
    by Anonymous on Monday November 19 2001, @12:09AM (#3719)
    I whole-heartedly disagree with your embittered view of this decision. I sympathise with the body of opinion that "-sucks" domain names are not confusingly similar to trade marks, but I find it difficult to raise a sniffle in cases where those in the habit of registering these domain names fail to armour plate their plans by taking the sort of precautions that by now one would regard as self-evident.

    Yes there are significant UDRP issues that need to be resolved, but in leaving a "-sucks" domain name inactive for 5 months you are asking for trouble. And by the way, your veiled criticism of the nationalities of those panellists that found against you does you absolutely no favours. The rest of the world has to put up with a flawed corporation that the US govt took upon itself to set up in order to run the internet. The least you could do is accept that international interpretations of law applicable to gTLDs can validly apply. If you want to exclude foriegn law and interpretation, register a .us domain name.

    Oh, I forgot, those aren't available yet. Funny that...
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Face it, you are a cybersquatter
    by Anonymous on Monday November 19 2001, @12:15AM (#3720)
    Mr. Sallen,

    Take a look in the mirror. You are a cybersquatter. You lost the Corinthians and Cruzeiro decisions because you registered several domain names identical to Brazilian soccer teams and then you contacted the teams with offers to sell. When they rejected your offers to sell, you put up bibical quotes on Corinthians.com.

    You have registered many domain names containing famous trademarks. This decision is less about past "sucks" decisions, and more about your own specific conduct.

    Wake up, you are a cybersquatter.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: UDRP ruling in VIVENDIUNIVERSALSUCKS.COM dispu
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Tuesday November 20 2001, @02:47AM (#3797)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    If your aim is to set up a noncommercial criticism site at a "sucks" address, .org would make more sense than .com -- or perhaps .info would be even better now. And whoever owns sucks.info can make subdomains of it for whatever criticism sites they wanted, and such subdomains aren't directly subject to the UDRP. (I registered haters.info and offered free redirected subdomains for protest sites, e.g. icann.haters.info, but nobody's taken me up on that offer yet.)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: I know the guy named dishonorable Ian Barker
    by Anonymous on Friday November 23 2001, @05:35AM (#3840)
    This Ian Barker sucks. Big time.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: people should sign protest to ouster this Ian
    by Anonymous on Friday November 23 2001, @05:39AM (#3842)
    from WIP panelis list for good.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: UDRP ruling in VIVENDIUNIVERSALSUCKS.COM dispu
    by Anonymous on Saturday November 24 2001, @01:46AM (#3852)
    This a good decision, not based on "sucks" names, but based on Sallen's pattern of conduct as a cybersquatter. A few more decisions and Sallen will join the Cybersquatter Hall of Shame along with Zuccarini.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: UDRP ruling in VIVENDIUNIVERSAL SUCKS.COM disp
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Wednesday December 05 2001, @09:57AM (#3937)
    User #2810 Info
    Tardy coverage sympathetic to Sallen from the Chicago Tribune Online. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: UDRP ruling in VIVENDIUNIVERSAL SUCKS.COM disp
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Saturday May 18 2002, @10:31AM (#6447)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    For once, I beg to disagree.

    The domain is clearly "abusive" and therefore represents registration and use in "bad faith."
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com