| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Touton on whether charters matter
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 3 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
It is good to have had clarification from ICANN as to what their stance is but disappointing that they refuse to take any responsibility at all for constituencies thay they personally approved.
Jon has articulated well the lack of logic behind this decision. Now that it is official that ICANN will not interfere no matter how flagrantly constituencies break their own charters it will be interesting to observe how this may affect constituency behaviour.
If one day we do get get an individual's constituency it will be great to be on the interim Executive because according to ICANN one could expel all other members of the constituency and appoint yourselves as Names Council members for life.
DPF
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
