ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    More Congressional Pressure for New TLDs | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: More Congressional Pressure for New TLDs
    by Anonymous on Monday August 13 2001, @09:16AM (#1808)
    I don't speculate. But your comment concerns me. Would you endorse the manditory ceasation of speculation in real estate? How about antique cars? Speculation in stocks? How about speculation in old comic books and baseball cards?

    Explain the fundamental difference between these fields and domain speculation?

    Why can't a person own 25 domains? Or 400? Or 2,000, if he is using them in one fashion or another? Would you call this kind of warehouse registration equivalent to speculation? Even if it is for the purpose of development?

    What about the person who owns 500 .coms, and has each and every one developed with information and portal services? Is that legit? Mind you, assume they are all perfectly generic domains. No cybersquatting here. Is it legit?

    Now assume someone comes along and offers this domain holder $10,000 for XYZ.com? Would you have a law in place that would make it illegal for the transaction to take place, even though both are willing participants?

    Please spell out your vision a bit better, because if it is to be written in as restrictive law, there has to be specific guidelines, clauses, provisions, clarifications, qualifications and the like. Then I would imagine some people would like to see precedents in other industries, for the kind of restrictions you would mandate in the domain industry.

    Nothing too Nazi-esque, now.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: So speculators are the only porblem?
    by Anonymous on Monday August 13 2001, @10:18AM (#1811)
    Speculation reflects the human nature.
    They exist one way or another. As long as
    the domain value is there, eyes are always
    wide open. If the eyes are not yours, must
    be someone else.

    To stop speculation, you better eliminate the
    domain value. One way can achieve that goal,
    that is open up as many new TLDs as possible.
    So many domain names are there, no one would like
    to buy any domain names from speculators any more.

    Then think of another angle. The more TLDs are opened
    up, the more confusion will be caused. The trademark
    lawyers will be the only beneficiary. No Offense to
    ICANNwatch.org lawyers or law professionals. I know
    you guys are great.

    John
    DomainManual.com
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com