ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    The XXX-piring Namespace - More Semantic Attacks | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 15 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: The XXX-piring Namespace - More Semantic Attac
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Sunday October 28 2001, @07:30PM (#3226)
    User #2810 Info
    A bit of follow-up. Perhaps being pressed for time, I mistakenly typed:
    that users time in their URL line
    which should read:
    that users type in their URL line
    I also neglected to point out another angle. At least as far back as last February Declan McCullagh and USA Today were reporting that Osama bin Laden and other terrorist organizations were using steganograpy, which is a method for hiding files within other files, for example a text file within a picture, perhaps on a porn site. Such a choice would make good sense, even with access to the server logs it would be difficult to decipher which hits on such high trafficked sites might be more meaningful. And just to bring my two recent submissions into some kind of closure, Bruce Shneier, from whom I borrowed the phrase semantic attacks, isn't very optimistic about the ability to stop such traffic. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: The XXX-piring Namespace - More Semantic Attac
    by Ron_Bennett on Sunday October 28 2001, @08:31PM (#3227)
    User #3011 Info | http://www.wyomissing.com/bennett/
    Relax...the adult industry has been using similar tactics with toll-free phone numbers for years...this is nothing new.

    If companies would pay their bills ONTIME they wouldn't lose their domains and thus wouldn't have such problems...Right?

    And the most important aspect being missed here is the fact that adult oriented companies actually make money using such tactics...NOW WHY IS THAT?? Think about it for a second...if one intends to reach website "company.com" and they somehow are redirected to "nudepixs.com" instead, one would expect they would LEAVE and correct their mistake...right? But it turns out that some people when misdirected for whatever reason, instead of leaving, they will actually whip out their credit card and SPEND MONEY on a website they didn't even intend to reach...and NO ONE FORCED them to do that. Right?

    I think it's high time for people to assume responsibility for their own actions - namely, renewing their domains on time...and lastly, why let expired domains go unused anyways...the adult industry helps maximize economy by recycling domains which helps registrars stay in business and in turn reduces the need to add more TLDs. A win win situation :-)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    I'm not too concerned about this -- and here's why
    by Anonymous on Sunday October 28 2001, @09:06PM (#3228)
    First of all -- I don't have any kids. Why is it the public's responsibility to protect other people's children from porn? Why does ICANN, or the Government have to do something to stop this?

    I say it is the parent's responsibility to monitor this stuff. If you are a parent and you don't want your kids to be exposed to this stuff you have a couple of choices:

    1) Buy filtering software and use it! There are many pieces of software that can filter URLS, eliminate pop-up ads, and ad banners, and offer your kids a "safe" surfing experience.

    2) Sit with your young kids and monitor their travels on the Internet. If you give the kid a phone line and a computer in their room and don't pay attention to their surfing habits-- you (as a parent)are to blame not the porn sites.

    3) If you are a religious fanatic and don't want your kids exposed to ANYTHING -- take away their computer. It is a safe bet that the Amish don't have problems like this in their house.

    I have yet to see evidence that pornography in general is "harmful" to anyone. When I was a young kid I stumbled on my dad's Playboys -- and enjoyed every minute of it.

    As far as I know -- porn has been around for a LONG, LONG time (way before the camera was even invented) and yet somehow, society is still here. Go figure.


    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: The XXX-piring Namespace - More Semantic Attac
    by Anonymous on Monday October 29 2001, @02:48AM (#3230)

    You need to ask the Business Constituency.
    They represent the XXX (adult content) industry.

    Commercial and Business Entities:

    AsiaPac (.nz) - Grant Forsyth grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz
    Europe (.uk) - Philip Sheppard philip.sheppard@aim.be
    NorthA (.us) - Marilyn Cade mcade@att.com


    Many people use root servers that are located
    on their internal corporate internet. According
    to the BC, they want that stopped. Those servers
    could give people different results in different
    companies. For example, an .XXX TLD may cause
    people to be redirected to an internal site, as
    opposed to the XXX sites run by the BC.

    Over 50% of the traffic on the Internet is
    related to the Adult Content industry. That
    is essentially the same as the BC. The BC
    wants to make sure that when you click on
    some body part, on one of their sites, that
    you get the result they want you to see.
    They want a consistent response for the
    Adult Content they package.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: The XXX-piring Namespace - More Semantic Attac
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Thursday November 01 2001, @08:20PM (#3346)
    User #2810 Info
    At least one more expiring domain becomes a porn site, and as the prior owner let numerous desirable names expire, it might not be the only one. Quite an interesting article on that and other namespace sillyness here. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: The XXX-piring Namespace - More Semantic Attac
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday November 02 2001, @06:07AM (#3356)
    User #2810 Info
    An article and user comments on this from Afternic. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com