Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    When Semantics Attack | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 19 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Procter and Gamble domains
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday October 23 2001, @11:37AM (#3105)
    User #2810 Info
    I suspect P&G will get around to attempting to take away proctorandgamble.com. I think they should as it is clearly intended to mislead.

    As for chevrolet.com, it does in fact lead to the auto maker. Likewise ford.com does in fact lead to the auto maker of that name. So all's right with the world?

    Well, no. That isn't the whole POINT of the DNS. If it was then those looking for the Ford (the link bypasses the Flash intro) model company would be lost. Even doing a search on Ford models is imprecise. :)

    Or perhaps they wanted the Ford Foundation, which is quite properly at .org, though not at Ford.org, or fordfoundation.org.

    Or perhaps they wanted the Ford Theatre, is that .commercial or an .organization? And which Ford Theatre do they want? And is the latter a theatre or should it be in the new .museum along with this Ford Museum and this Ford Museum?

    The relevant original POINT of the DNS was to allow one Ford commercial entity at .com, one Ford network at .net, one Ford organization (or other entity) at .org, first come, first served, and a ton of Fords at com.au, org.uk et cetera with varying levels of control. If you weren't the first Ford in your space you might have to get only slightly creative. That worked quite well for quite a long time. When it was clear that it wouldn't scale (about a decade ago), we could have gone to ford.auto and ford.agency and ford.theatre and ford.museum. Well, not that last one, but as a matter of fact the registry for .museum won't allow such collisions, and that too is part of the solution. I didn't consider it sufficiently newsworthy to submit it separately, but new.net's announcement of yesterday is interesting in this regard.

    Regardless, all this only deals with the artificial scarcity which is used by insiders as a cash cow. It still doesn't solve the problem of:


    which was my original point. As Dan and others have pointed out, one needn't even use this exploit, a hoaxer could simply register a confusingly similar .com domain name for less than $10, perhaps giving bogus WHOIS info, perhaps using an untraceable credit card number, and use it for the hoax. I guess the answer is to not take domain names, or hyperlinks, or search engine results, as authoritative, at least until Veri$ign and/or Micro$oft come out with something that provides absolute verification. We all trust them, right? -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com