ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Verisign Registry Angling For Price Increase | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Verisign Registry Angling For Price Increase
    by Anonymous on Tuesday October 16 2001, @05:38PM (#2970)
    So Tucows, who can't build a .INFO registry to save their lives, now complains about the other brain dead registry?

    Is Tucows the pot or the kettle?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Verisign Registry Angling For Price Increase
    by kodo (binaryloop@nospam.yahoo.com) on Tuesday October 16 2001, @06:58PM (#2972)
    User #21 Info | http://www.paradigm.nu/icann
    Why does this not surprise me?

    Resigning a contract with them was a HUGE mistake for ICANN! Just about everyone on the Net totally opposed the new VeriSign / ICANN contract.

    Why do you think nobody wanted to do business with these guys?

    Although I got to say that support changing the re-registration process. This joke of NSI holding onto expired domains has got to stop!

    The minute that VeriSign bought GreatDomains someone should have hauled their butts into court!

    "Money is the most egalitarian force in society. It confers power on whoever holds it."
    -- Roger Starr
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Verisign Registry Angling For Price Increase
    by Anonymous on Tuesday October 16 2001, @07:18PM (#2975)
    I love it! First they screw up the new TLDs, and then they raise the price on .COM! Didn't Mr. Dawson just point this out?

    Wasn't this just the argument that was made for more competition? That without it, we're subject to what they called "lock in"?

    It's about time that ICANN is forced to open the root to real competition. Do that, and who cares if .COM raises prices?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Verisign Registry Angling For Price Increase
    by Ron_Bennett on Tuesday October 16 2001, @11:30PM (#2977)
    User #3011 Info | http://www.wyomissing.com/bennett/
    Lesson to be learned here:

    Renew any critical domains for the MAX term of 10 years at today's low prices. This a policy I generally follow for critical domains that I maintain.

    .COM prices will someday be much more than they are now, assuming .COM remains dominant...I project a price range of around $50 to $100 per year for .COM domains within the the next 5 years. And upwards of $250 per year by 2010.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Verisign Registry Angling For Price Increase
    by JohnR (yes@fakemail.com) on Wednesday October 17 2001, @07:42AM (#2986)
    User #2937 Info
    Afiasco for the U.S. Government.

    I am afraid that the government officials
    have some stakes with the domain industry so
    they just open one eye and close another.

    I have no say about the conduct of
    verisign and even ICANN. Greed is the human
    nature of some people at least.

    But I supposed the government should do something
    for the citizens no that they take some much
    taxes?

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Verisign Registry Angling For Price Increase
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday October 19 2001, @10:33AM (#3024)
    User #2810 Info
    According to the URLY Indicator, a weekly email sent out by Afternic.com, a domain name auction site, they have launched a testbed to auction off expiring names. The first, and so far apparently only, registrar to take part is Register.com, not surprising as Register.com owns Afternic.

    Newbies may not be aware that prior to that ownership, Afternic got into a lawsuit with ICANN over its wish to partner with a registrar. That was settled out of court with some wonky agreement that the auction and registrar would have to distance themselves through some intermittent gateway page (which didn't seem to survive the Register.com takeover, there is a direct Register.com link off the Afternic homepage). BTW the ICANN position (it it was such, it seems to have been Louis Touton acting on its own, it certainly wasn't policy) that registrars and aftermarket be kept separate is one of the few ICANN positions I agreed with at the time (though there should be a policy, not a position). Seens to me Register.com is now making it even more necessary for a policy for expiring names. Neither site's front page has mention of this 'testbed' at the time of writing. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com