ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Why ICANN is really in the Dot Com business | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Why ICANN is really in the Dot Com business
    by Anonymous on Monday October 15 2001, @09:14AM (#2932)
    ICANN could remove itself from a lot of this muck by just approving Image Online Design and letting them screw up on their own. Make it IOD's screwup instead of ICANN's.

    As long as ICANN maintains such a strong grip on things, they also maintain all of the blame.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Why ICANN is really in the Dot Com business
    by Ron_Bennett on Monday October 15 2001, @01:11PM (#2935)
    User #3011 Info | http://www.wyomissing.com/bennett/
    My thoughts regarding this article...

    From a .INFO / .BIZ registrant perspective, I'm miffed how badly these new TLDs have been managed while ICANN seems to be ignoring the whole situation. Applications "lost", bogus IP claims, illegal lotteries, and general incompetence all around...

    But from a .COM registrant perspective, I'm so relieved and happy!! My businesses are going to save tens of thousands of dollars by not having to worry about all these new TLDs - and at the same time .COM domains have just become more valuable and will remain so for the foreseeable future.

    The article hit on to something few people have considered - .COM is so valuable that it's in ICANN's interest (big business) to make sure new TLDs fail; this should not come as any surprise to anyone who use to read the Domain-Policy list where the demise of new TLDs was long predicted.

    Domain Policy List Archives - late 1999 to May-24-2001 (the end) - about 20 MB http://www.wyomissing.com/bennett/domainpolicyarchives.zip

    Anyways, it's a great day in .COM land! Thanks again for ICANN for everything!! :-;

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Why ICANN is really in the Dot Com business
    by Anonymous on Monday October 15 2001, @01:53PM (#2936)
    So what are you saying, Ron? That ICANN deliberately chose the insiders to ensure that they win either way? If the insiders do well, ICANN wins. If the insiders do poorly, ICANN wins with .COM?

    Wouldn't that amount to nothing more than a conspiracy to ensure that there's no new competition either way? Because if that's true, you're looking at 35+ turned down applicants who were defrauded out of $50,000 each!

    I like the question at the end of the article, Kendal.

    "Is there an antitrust lawyer in the house?"
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Why ICANN is really in the Dot Com business
    by Anonymous on Tuesday October 16 2001, @05:51AM (#2946)
    Kendall:

    You state that

    a) Afilias is a Verisign puppet;
    b) Afilias has not deployed the technical systems specified in their ICANN contract (thus presumably breaching the contract) and;
    c) Afilias and ICANN are collusive to the point of breaching anti-trust/anti-competition regulation.

    Can you substantiate any of this?

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com