ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Could Verisign's Registrar Acquisitions Help Industry & Hurt Verisign? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 7 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    What is Euro909?
    by lextext on Thursday June 21 2001, @08:31AM (#929)
    User #6 Info | http://www.lextext.com
    By the way, what is Euro909? As near as I can tell, neither it nor its domain name registration subsidiary (NetName-Solutions) was an ICANN-accredited registrar. Which suggests that it was reselling under someone else's license, Core, OpenSRS or perhaps even NSI. The press release describing the tight historic relationship with Verisign makes me think it might simply have been a reseller for NSI, which wouldn't change the numbers on NSI's market share. Any ideas about what Euro909 actually is?

    -- Bret

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Could Verisign's Registrar Acquisitions Help I
    by hofjes on Thursday June 21 2001, @08:50AM (#930)
    User #60 Info
    Verisign's value is based on a lot more than just its registrar services. Its registry contract, incredible cash holdings, and other businesses add substantially to its valuation.

    The sale price for Registrars should not be misconstrued as its value. The owners sold because Verisign offered a huge amount of money (though the amount may be much less than the actual value). The american dream is to build a business, sell out, and retire. Registrars accomplished this.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    34.7?
    by lextext on Thursday June 21 2001, @10:47AM (#933)
    User #6 Info | http://www.lextext.com
    Where do you get the $34.7 per domain name registrant figure? -- Bret
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Could Verisign's Registrar Acquisitions Help I
    by larry on Sunday June 24 2001, @06:02AM (#953)
    User #2751 Info
    I don't agree that the press release indicates that they paid 9 million. This is what the press release says:

    "Under the terms of the transaction, VeriSign, Inc. agrees to pay Network Commerce all cash
    for Registrars.com. As of June 18, 2001, the Company's cash position was approximately
    $9.0 million or approximately $1.67 per share."

    You are trying to infer a price paid for registrars.com from the cash position of the parent company or the value of the stock of the entire company. The value of a part of a company could easily be more than the entire company when various liabilities are taken into account.

    If they wanted to disclose what was paid for registrars.com they would have stated what they paid for the company.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com