ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    NewZealand.biz Awarded to the New Zealand Government | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 23 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: NewZealand.biz Awarded to the New Zealand Gove
    by Anonymous on Friday October 11 2002, @03:45AM (#9700)
    The nature in which the government has gone about seizing NewZealand.biz amounts to little more than bullying other legitimate companies into seizing their assets, and pure government censorship.

    The Government does not have any rights to this domain name greater than any other entity or person in New Zealand:

    1. The government body (TradeNZ) applying for this name does *not* have a fully registered trademark for this name; according to the Intellectual Property Office, they have a trademark application that has not yet been approved. It is also extremely debatable whether they have any common law rights to the name greater than any other New Zealand person or organisation. Where, in any statute, particularly in the Trademarks Act, does it state that the term “New Zealand” can be owned exclusively by the government without any form of authorised and registered trademark ?

    2. TradeNZ has used big-bullying words and tactics in their WIPO application to either (a) impress WIPO and/or (b) scare the respondent in this case to give the domain up.

    3. The fact that they've tried to "cover this up" by asking this case to not be published (detailed in the WIPO decision) seems very dubious indeed.

    4. The NZ trademarks office literature actually states that you cannot register trademarks that are "Geographical locations which are associated with the goods or services e.g. Ohakune for carrots, Bluff for oysters." So why should the government be above its own trademark laws? Trade New Zealand is currently attempting to register the term "New Zealand" for what, exactly? Pink bunny slippers?!!!

    5. The NZ Government namespace is .govt.nz in to which it has absolute right. Claiming other namespaces is a slippery slope towards dictatorial control of Internet content and an impediment to free speech in this country.

    6. The complainant in this case, supposedly “Her Majesty the Queen, in right of her Government in New Zealand”, claims that the term “New Zealand” is owned collectively by all NZ citizens, organizations and the State. And yet the agency acting for “all New Zealand” is merely the New Zealand Trade Development Board (TradeNZ). Who is to say that TradeNZ can adequately reflect all New Zealanders?

    It seems that their website tradenz.com (also available at tradenz.govt.nz) isn't enough for them.

    About a year ago, when the first .biz Neulevel ‘lottery’ began, TradeNZ, through its crafty lawyers tried to “game” the Neulevel system by entering no less than six applications for this name. Their thinking must have been that the more applications, the greater its chances to become the first randomly selected IP owner to have the rights to initiate a STOP proceeding. As it so happened, they were the only one to lodge an IP against this name (despite other companies both in New Zealand and overseas actually owning a *legitimately registered trademark*)...

    If you’re interested in how I know all this, I too wanted to register NewZealand.biz for my company selling New Zealand tours. I spent a great deal of money and time in what I believed was a randomly selected round-robin. When I didn’t get the name, I was disappointed, but actually glad that it didn’t go to TradeNZ at least. Howerver their strong-arm bullying tactics appear to have finally paid off.

    People who have any other form of country-based / geographical domain name – beware. This case sets a very dangerous precedent for what the quasi-government agencies can snatch away from you.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com