ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Physical location of .us nameservers | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 16 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Physical location of .us nameservers
    by Anonymous on Wednesday October 09 2002, @05:22AM (#9672)
    Just noting that this is not a joke:
    From The usTLD Nexus Requirements, page 2:
    Certification that the listed name servers are located within the United States – if not completed, then registration will be rejected
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Physical location of .us nameservers
    by Anonymous on Wednesday October 09 2002, @09:36AM (#9679)
    Is this for real? It is utterly stupid - in fact it is a direct threat to the stability of DNS - to require that servers for .us be within the USA.

    This policy condemns those outside the US - including US citizens who travel, or for remote offices of US companies - to additional and unnecessary risks that .us names may fail to resolve.

    ICANN condemns alternate roots as a threat to stability, yet ICANN has demonstrated again and again that ICANN and the its policies it encourages, and in this case the policies it tacitly approves by its silence, are the a real and direct threat to the stability of the domain name system.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Physical location of .us nameservers
    by Anonymous on Wednesday October 09 2002, @09:38AM (#9680)
    Could someone substantiate the claim that this is a Department of Commerce requirement?

    If it is, it would be interesting to speak with the numbskull who thought up this rule and imposed it.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Neustar in talk with DoC to change requirement
    by Anonymous on Thursday October 10 2002, @01:31AM (#9685)

    From http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0208/0129.html:

    Charles,

    I'd just add to this that we're in dialogue with the US Department of
    Commerce to change this physical requirement as we think it's been
    made
    somewhat outdated by internet technology.

    Nevertheless it is, and will for the foreseeable future, be a
    requirement.
    Your advice to your customers is correct (as always).


    Regards

    Richard Tindal
    Vice President
    Channel Relationships and Sales
    NeuStar Registry
    www.neulevel.biz
    www.neustar.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Physical location of .us nameservers
    by vbertola on Friday October 11 2002, @04:50AM (#9702)
    User #3435 Info | http://bertola.eu.org/
    As far as I know, there is only one other country of the world that requires DNS servers for subdomains of its ccTLD to be physically located inside the country. And yes, just like the US, it is a country known for its peculiar ways of embracing of the free trade and free communication principles: China.
    --vb. (Vittorio Bertola)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com