| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
ICANN Struggles With Transparency
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 3 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I agree with this assessment of the significance of ICANN's silence. ICANN's Bylaws specifically require that all Indepeendent review requests must be posted on the ICANN Web site, but none are.
But it is false to say that "ICM has chosen to become the first entity in history to attempt to use ICANN's Independent Review Process". There are have been at least 3 [hasbrouck.org] previous requests for Independent Review, including by Edward Hasbrouck [hasbrouck.org],Karl Auerbach [cavebear.com], and Dotster [icann.org] These are all years old, but still pending and still being ignored by ICANN.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|