ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    TLD Registration Enforcement: A Call for Automation | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 30 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    .COM / .NET / .ORG
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday September 27 2002, @06:55AM (#9426)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    When .COM, .NET, and .ORG started, they could be described as "open and chartered"; while registrations were open to the public (not tightly controlled like .GOV and .MIL), there were intended purposes documented in RFC 1591 that the registry/registrar was expected to enforce -- in the early days, many attempted registrations got rejected due to their applicant not being the proper sort of entity (I can recall an attempt on my own part to register a .NET domain on the behalf of a client that was turned down because they weren't a network infrastructure provider). But then Network Solutions (the monopoly registrar and registry at the time) dropped the ball and stopped even trying to enforce these rules, and the free-for-all began.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: .COM / .NET / .ORG
    by Anonymous on Friday September 27 2002, @07:28AM (#9428)
    "and the free-for-all began."

    I do not know that I would call it a free-for-all. There was a ton of demand for domain names from the market place between '97 and '99 and the USG had no mechanism in place to allow new entry but did cap wholesale pricing at $6 based upon some magical, top secret formula I have not seen. My guess is that costs of policing just were not part of this formula that determined the price cap...so NSI dropped it all together (and then sells for $15B+).

    Then, the USG creates a new entity to allow entry into the TLD spectrum and - though not formally stated as a regulatory price fixing scheme - this entity limits new TLD's to those at $6 or less. Now, Ben comes along and says that the new, restrictive registries are not policing its registrations at the second level. Well, at the price cap of $6, NSI said as much 2 years earlier.

    What does this say about the qualifications of ICANN to admit new TLD's where factors outside of those that are technical in nature are considered to be within its scope?

    Ray

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Netsol's decision arguably profit-driven
    by edelman@law.harvard. on Friday September 27 2002, @07:41AM (#9430)
    User #884 Info | http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/edelman.html
    I tend to tell the story somewhat differently. Once Netsol was receiving $35/domain, I gather they no longer cared to enforce registration restrictions. This stands to reason, of course -- more registrations yield more revenue and more profits. And that's arguably not unlikely what we now see in .NAME etc.

    As I recall the chronology, first Netsol started getting paid per name registered (rather than a fixed fee per year), then dropped the registration restrictions. I'll definitely fact-check that, though!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com