| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN Bid for Independent Status Gets Cool Reception
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 25 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Oops I hit submit rather than preview.
Anyway I was about to close by saying that the interest that the registries have is via contracts with ICANN and is derivative of ICANN's interest in those TLDs.
If ICANN were to lose that interest then the registries would, as a consequence, be left with nothing (except a legal claim against ICANN.)
By-the-way, Danny Younger's question about the removal of material from actual ICANN forums has not yet been answered. We understand that you removed some potentially objectionable or irrelevant material from the blog. But we are not asking about the blog but, rather, about the actual ICANN comment forums.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
