| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN Bid for Independent Status Gets Cool Reception
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 25 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Kieren says, " I am in no position to start making changes to the bylaws." But I'm not talking about changes in the Bylaws. I'm talking about the existing Bylaws, which require the maximum extent feasible of transparency.
I don't think transparency is a *sufficient* condition for public participation, and I appreciate the efforts you are making to develop addiitonal methods for public participation. But I do think *transparency* is a necessary condition for informed public participation (as well as a requirement of the Bylaws).
If transparency isn't your job at ICANN, whose job is it (if anyone's)?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:Pick up the phone!
by ehasbrouck
|
| Starting Score: |
1 |
point |
| Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
2 |
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
