Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN PR Outdoes Itself | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 3 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Having a cake, calling it a lobster and eating it
    by Kieren McCarthy on Saturday March 31 2007, @02:31PM (#16919)
    User #4206 Info
    I don't get this. For years you - and everyone else, including me - has been complaining that the ALAC has been powerless in its interim status.

    So then Africa and Europe organise themselves into lobbying groups, ALAC gets some legitimacy and you loosely weave a step forward into another unexplained conspiracy.

    What exactly is the issue here? I saw on stage alot of people in the Net community decide to work together to give a single voice to the average Net user within ICANN - finally creating a structure that has to be taken more seriously -- and yet you portray it as somehow a damaging thing.

    The ALAC has to represent, ideally, millions of people. How on earth do millions of voices have an impact unless through a series of filtering organisations?

    It's up to the ALAC to suck up the information, arrive at a conclusion and then stand up and tell ICANN that it represents the opinion of all the people out there on the network.

    I hope - and I'll do my absolute best to ensure it happens - that the ALAC is up to the job and that its advice is taken as seriously as the other advisory committees.

    The only people being fools here are those that don't sign up and push, push, push to have their view taken on board.

    If the ALAC can build up, make a solid recommendation and then see itself ignored, well then you are right to make a stink. But to leap off into dismissing a crystal-clear step in that process is ridiculous.

    What is the particular fantasy you hold that will suddenly see the average Net user have a say in ICANN's processes?

    The more people that are involved, the more powerful ALAC is. Without those numbers, it's just a couple of people in a room arguing. And that, as we all know, has got nowhere.

    General manager of public participation, ICANN

    If you want to know the answer btw it is: get as many people involved as possible. I am happy to do all I can to help.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com