| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
"Independent Review Provider" (Not)
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 18 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Curiouser and curiouser, Alice!
I guess someone should be out there tilting at
windmills...
But surely you can't be the only one?
If ICANN is so unresponsive and recalcitrant, then
where is the angry swarm of other complaintants? Has
everyone else given up and resigned to the status quo,
as dictated to them by ICANN?
So ICANN swat away a few minor irritants, while either
A) selling out to the big-money interests, or B) doing
nothing for so long that other countries get fed up, and
start running their own root. (Wouldn't THAT be fun!)
Anyway, sooner or later people are going to realize that
the small number of TLDs is an artifically-created
shortage. When that occurs, they will naturally act to
correct it. To the extent that ICANN attempts to impede
that progress, they will be worked around and made
irrelevant. This might happen in as little as a couple
of years, or it might take another decade. But it will
happen.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
