ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    "Independent Review Provider" (Not) | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 18 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    ICANN/ISOC is the Master of Liability Deflection
    by Anonymous on Monday April 24 2006, @10:31AM (#16721)
    ICANN/ISOC is the Master of Liability Deflection

    People just do not get it. The spooks, academics,
    and legal players behind the whole Cerf Society
    house of cards (ICANN, ISOC, ARIN, etc.) are
    masters of Liability Deflection.

    All of the systems they have set up are designed to
    provide a continuous run-around. Most people get
    tired of the game and fade from the scene.

    If you have an issue with a Registry, the Registry
    will tell you ICANN makes them do what they do.
    ICANN claims the Registries operate on their own.
    Registrars are the same way, they claim the
    Registry calls the shots, yet they pay ICANN to
    endorse them as Registrars. It is ironic that the
    entire concept of a Registry and Registrar is
    totally artificial, and not needed. The Cerf
    Society just makes it all up as they go along.

    One of the main attributes of the Cerf Society is
    that they are never responsible or accountable
    for anything. Pay no attention to what they do
    with all the revenues. That is their private
    money they treat like donations. The Consensus
    Sham is one of their many outs, which they invoke
    to give people the old verbal kiss off (.VKO).
    They claim everything is based on "Community
    Consensus". It is a street-gang-like cop-out.

    They have built billion dollar personal fortunes
    on it, for decades. They really believe that they
    are "right" and a "success". They tell each other
    that every chance they get, but they never line
    up to be accountable or responsible.

    ICANN's next secret move is of course to deflect
    a lot of attention and liability to the new
    NeuStar conglomerate the insiders are building
    to serve ICANN. Watch the shell game as the .XXX
    liabilities are pushed off to New.Net and the
    new "community" ICANN is grooming. ICANN has
    plenty of funding and is not going to risk any
    of that. The new game (actually the old game also)
    is to control, grow, and deflect 99% of the
    legal liabilities to suckers in line ready to
    carry the ball, and pay ICANN for the honor of
    doing that.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com