| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
US Requests Info From Folks Who'd Like to Be IANA
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 10 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Most of the work described by this RFI is performed in support of the IETF. (Also, most of the work described is clerical.)
The IETF is not the only standards or engineering body that is involved with the internet. So I have to ask, as I have asked for years, how come NTIA has a warm spot in its heart for the IETF but not the W3C or the IEEE or any of the other bodies that have helped define the internet and who, unlike the IETF, pay their own clerical costs rather than having them gifted via the US government?
NTIA ought to be picking up the tab for either *all* of these engineering and standards bodies or for *none* of them.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
| Starting Score: |
2 |
points |
| Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
3 |
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
