| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Any Free Speech Left in .US?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 10 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Cable rules? Broadcast rules? Network rules? [or ICANN rules?]
"The only reason to regulate here (cynicism) would be to protect the business models of existing broadcasters [Registrars] and the telcos/cablecos [Registries] who want to become broadcasters and want to create barriers to entry to others. There is no scarcity or "public airwave" or "invasion into the home" or spectrum allocation rationale for regulation of online video."
---
There is no scarcity in the name-space. Just make .COM the new root and call it a day. Forty plus
million TLDs can't be wrong. Oops, better start
to worry about that [job] security and stability
and the load on the .COM servers. Funny, that has
not ever been a concern before.
Just imagine .COM is not there and it is just a
dot, the root at the right.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
