ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Five More Years! WSIS Settles Nothing but Paves Way for More Debate | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 28 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    .COM Name Costs to Match Yellow Page Rates
    by Anonymous on Wednesday November 23 2005, @01:13PM (#16538)
    .COM Name Costs to Match Yellow Page Rates

    ICANN and Verisign are teaming up to be just one
    of many .COM Registries. They are raising the .COM
    rates, to pay for the added costs of competing
    with the "other" .COM Registries. [Think Yellow
    Pages and telcos and other countries.]

    The U.S. Government plans to try to prevent your
    .COM name from being used in other Yellow Pages,
    but, they can not prevent you from being charged
    IF you want to be listed in the other .COM
    servers. That is really not much different from
    paying to be listed in Google, and that money
    flows to Vinton Cerf the Chairman of ICANN.

    Some selected Registrars are being invited to
    be part of the coming cloning of the .COM servers.
    Again, your name will not be used by someone
    else if you do not pay, it will just not be
    listed. That is like not having a Yellow Page
    ad.

    Walled Gardens plan to fund themselves partly
    from the .COM revenues. Again, that is not much
    different from Google funding projects from
    opt-in advertisers. As a Walled Garden provider,
    you can easily direct users to special pages
    that indicate that a .COM name is not listed.
    That does not mean it does not exist.

    One existing Walled Garden WIFI provider that
    plans to shoot for the Stars and make big Bucks
    already blocks many .COM names. They direct users
    to a web page that indicates that the .COM
    owner has been filtered for various reasons,
    including adult content and/or illegal sale of
    drugs.

    ICANN and Verisign are teaming up to be just one
    of many .COM Registries. ICANN Registrars just
    do not get it, at least the Registrars that have
    not been invited to be part of the new .COM
    Registries.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com