| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Victory Ready To Renew MOU
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 26 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I don't have answers to your good questions Ray, and I doubt you'll get any from Nancy Victory. The ITU is already involved in the regulation of radio frequencies, telephone numbers, ENUM and a host of other areas. While there are sometimes issues and debates regarding some of these, they are orders of magnitude less than the issues surrounding ICANN, even though many of them deal with far more finite resources than ICANN has responsibility for. This can probably be put down to the ITU for the most part being competent and not corrupt, and ICANN for the most part being incompetent and corrupt. I don't think either leaving regulation to ICANN or leaving regulation undefined is a good situation, I suspect some of those delegates to the ITU feel the same. -g
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re: Victory Ready To Renew MOU
by fnord
|
|
|
| 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
