ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN Names New Board-Members-to-Be | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 24 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Of the Lawyers, By the Lawyers, For the Lawyers
    by Anonymous on Saturday November 12 2005, @05:32PM (#16488)
    Of the Lawyers, By the Lawyers, For the Lawyers

    Lawyers are mostly "walking conflicts of interest".

    Their goal is to fill THEIR billable time and to
    employ flunkies (staff members) that they bill at
    top dollar and take a huge cut. If they do not
    build a large staff, they are earnings-limited
    because as of right now, there are only 24 hours
    in a day. The ICANN Board may attempt to change
    that, but it is a consensus view at this point.

    Lawyers are mostly "walking conflicts of interest".

    Their fees come from "clients", not from some
    product or service they develop and deploy.
    While they may place themselves in the royalty
    stream, they are not the ones that compose and
    sing the songs. They do develop a view that *your
    right* to hear that song flows thru them and
    comes from them. They are the toll-booth
    operators. You grant them that right, and pay
    them, despite that inherent conflict of interest.
    What is impressive is that they convince you that
    you want to involuntarily donate to their
    interest, themselves.

    Lawyers are mostly "walking conflicts of interest".

    Their goal is to extract as much wealth from their
    client as they can, without their client noticing
    or objecting or doing a cost-benefit analysis.
    The fees end when the money is gone. They move on
    to another sucker, and attempt to hide their
    inherent conflict of interest.

    Lawyers are mostly "walking conflicts of interest".

    ICANN is "Of the Lawyers, By the Lawyers, For the Lawyers". Once domain names are free, as in
    money, people will look back and wonder why they
    ever tolerated the welfare state of lawyers.
    The good news is that as the Internet implodes,
    all that will be left will be lawyers feeding on
    lawyers. They have their whois database, and their
    view that corporations, trusts, trademarks and
    other artificial creations are the bed-rock of
    society. The net is a given to them, and it does
    not matter if people disconnect or route around
    it. They measure the health by the demand for
    their billable time. As long as people continue
    to play into their game, they will laugh all the
    way to the bank.

    ICANN is "Of the Lawyers, By the Lawyers, For the Lawyers".
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com