ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Pretty Brazen | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 15 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:The Big Losers are the Other Registries
    by Anonymous on Thursday October 27 2005, @12:51AM (#16361)
    Everybody wants .com - the game is already over. Nobody wants a second rate TLD

    mycompany.biz mycompany.web couldn't afford a .com then?

    watch .travel and .jobs soar - sure.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:The Big Losers are the Other Registries by Anonymous
    "Everybody wants .com - the game is already over."
    by Anonymous on Thursday October 27 2005, @07:09AM (#16362)
    "Everybody wants .com - the game is already over."

    The game was over long ago when thousands of new
    TLDs should have been allowed into the root zone
    to head off what people now see, the .COM Root.

    People lied about the capacity of the root zone
    and protected their TLDs, especially ccTLDs, now
    they will find those UNDER the .COM.

    Where is .WEB ?

    See: WEB.COM

    Stay away from .NET, it now triggers IPv6 when
    you use one of those names. The .NET TLD is
    being re-shaped by the FCC and Telcos and ISPs
    to be an SS7-like signalling .NETwork for
    insiders. It just changes 1 bit in the packets
    from 0100 (4) to 0110 (6). Nothing else changes
    but the address space and routing is telco-only.
    Most consumers are happy with .COM and do not
    mess with any bits that may cause their service
    to be cut-off. If they access a .NET name, they
    get a screen that asks if they are authorized
    and accredited to proceed, and are also provided
    a .COM name for consumer access, via the COMmons.

    The U.S. Government, Verisign, ICANN and
    others have succeeded in moving 99% of the
    people into the COMmons, where they can be
    watched and controlled. People now equate .COM with "safe to use, backed by big money,
    stable, part of the COMmons, etc.". People
    really only want to look at and read about
    what is pre-approved and being looked at by
    others. The last thing many people on Earth
    want to be is, the only person or one of the
    only people who know some important fact or
    witness some important event. Governments and
    the press will ruin their lives. Instead, they
    prefer to populate the COMmons.

    "Everybody wants .com"
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com