ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    The Failure of Internet Unilateralism | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 24 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    After seeing how Canada
    by Anonymous on Monday October 24 2005, @01:06PM (#16336)
    Railroaded Zundel and put up speech review boards, and knowing that when I lived in Germany I was subject to the same ... Ahh, I think I see what their end game is here. Every one of these places wants to cut out things it doesn't like, censor communications it doesn't like, regulate away companies it doesn't like... Let these folks do it and we will end up with a global tax, and global licenses. It will end up a 'well regulated top down privledge'. Well, you can bend over with the KY if you want, but as far as I am concerned, they can shove it up their own.

    Yeah, we created a red light district on the internet. We also created a kids section. The kids section works, and no one is going to gripe about that. The red light one probably wont work out as well because of existing domains elsewhere, but its an attempt to make it easier for parents who want to give their kids a safe passage. The reason the red light may not work out as well is that they aren't being heavy handed about it, its voluntary to use it. Its simply in the hopes that those selling those kinds of services move their domains there and understand a large portion of the world would love to have a safe place for their kids in this space, and voluntary cooperation would go a long way toward that.

          Its a nice concept, but just like .org we know it wont be followed to the letter, but its something for the long haul. If that had been implimented in 1994-5 it wouldn't be an issue today. As it is, the net effect will merely be that one of the most profitible sections of the internet, porn delivery, has its own segment of the net if it wants to use it. Hence, parents groups, childrens groups, Muslim groups, Christian groups, much of the porn industry, and many governments asked for it. Different ones wanted heavy handed tactics employed, and that wasn't going to happen, but is the end result a bad thing?

    As it is now, countries are still free to pass their own laws, and they aptly demonstrate their ability to harass search engines, auction sites, commerce sites of every kind in the aim of eliminating speech & content they don't like. Yeah, I'm sure these folks would like "top down" control of the net. For exactly this reason, they shouldn't have it.

    Nothing like going before a human rights tribunal because you said something someone somewhere doesn't like. That is the future they envision. This system may not be perfect, but its a far cry better than that. The end result of the proposals I've seen will be tyranny and gulags. It wont start that way, but it will end up that way, and what make the net useful in the first place will largely disappear. A lot of governments in the world would like that. A lot of companies would like that.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com