ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Statement on USG .xxx Intervention Gains Support | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 100 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:Changes Coming to New IP Stack Code in .NET Eng
    by Anonymous on Sunday September 04 2005, @05:20AM (#16182)
    DHT - Distributed Hash Table code is also now being
    put into the IP stack. All of the 16 Golden Addresses in the cache are expected to be DHT servers.

    The DHT key is 160 bits.

    Names from the 4-bit character set (that has DOT)
    are mapped on to the 160-bit key field. That allows
    for 40 character domain names, including the dots
    and the TLDs and even a dot at the right if that
    floats your boat.

    DHT is an approach where your node sends out
    a GET using a 160-bit Key and back comes one
    or more 512 byte blocks that have been stored
    via that Key. The 160-bits LOOK like IP address
    headers with or without bad checksums. They
    can be stealthed in via IP-in-IP and look like
    an IP header. [Note: NANOG thugs attempt to
    block them.]

    The 160-bit KEY is often created by taking
    your THREE MAC addresses which are 48 bits each.
    Add some DOTs between the addresses and you
    have a UNIQUE key with 8 bits left to have some
    room in case of collisions.

    With DHT you do a PUT into the .NET and your
    512 bytes are cached and replicated. Others can
    go a GET and read your 512 bytes if they use
    the same KEY.

    Illiterate people think the 160-bit KEY is an
    IP header and attempt to play their games with
    it. They can not imagine how a 40 character
    domain name can be used to derive the KEY.
    40 times 4 is 160. Duh

    Route around the NANOG thugs. The U.S. telcos
    are in New Orleans and have agreed not to play
    games with packets, such as black-holing done
    by ARIN Trustees.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Changes Coming to New IP Stack Code in .NET Eng by Anonymous


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com