ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    The DoC and XXX | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 72 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    US Commerce Dept's intervention raises issues
    by Anonymous on Friday August 26 2005, @06:55AM (#16100)
    https://ssl.cpsr.org/pipermail/governance/2005-Aug ust/003455.html

    On August 11, the U.S. Commerce Department
    responded to a campaign by conservative relligious
    groups favoring online content controls by telling
    ICANN to reconsider its agreement to create a new
    .xxx top-level domain for sexual content.
    ICANN complied by delaying its process.

    The US Commerce Dept's intervention raises
    profound issues about how the Internet is governed.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    FACT: The U.S. Government operates several servers that it owns. Via those servers, they publish
    THEIR view of the root-zone. They are free to do
    that and people are free to listen or not. More
    and more, people do not listen, even Americans.

    ICANN wants it both ways, they want to be funded
    and endorsed by the U.S. Government, yet, want
    to thumb their noses at their funders and
    endorsers, and leverage that in international
    forums where there are many that want to destroy
    Americans. It is a dishonest academic game.

    The so-called "intervention" by the U.S. Department
    of Commerce illustrates that freedom of speech
    still exists. That is good, not bad. ICANN and
    the ISOC want to take away that freedom and
    replace it with their soviet-like system based
    on academic cronyism. That is not a system based
    on free will and free speech. That is a system
    where the academics and legal sharks determine
    who "the right people" are and those are the
    people who get to speak and dominate all forums.
    They are the ones funded to travel to the
    expensive face-to-face meetings where "the
    Party Line" is the only line, besides the line
    at the free buffet.

    Education is a key and the academics appear to
    be concerned that "religious groups" are becoming
    better educated and that the U.S. Government
    is also beginning to see the light. Academics
    want to dismiss consumers and prevent them from
    becoming educated (very ironic considering the
    business academics claim to be in). Academics
    want to step in to create MORE layers of
    regulatory regimes, such as ICANN, to allow
    them to dictate consumer's choices.

    The U.S. Government is one consumer and a large
    consumer but not the only consumer. If the
    U.S. Government decides one direction, some
    consumers might follow and some might go in the
    opposite direction just to be different. Academics
    only want one direction, their direction. That
    leads to a least-common-denominator world which
    discourages innovation, creativity, debate, etc.
    As people now see, the only people at ICANN are
    now those that nod the Party Line and walk like
    zombies from one venue to the next.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:US Commerce Dept's intervention raises issues
    by Anonymous on Friday August 26 2005, @07:28AM (#16101)
    Just one of many examples of how Vinton Cerf's
    Internet Society (ISOC) and IETF fail to listen
    to FREE market based approaches...

    ... so multicast DNS has been around, with various implementations over the years.
    the Apple mDNS spec is not an IETF work product, in part because the IETF rejected
    it. Same w/ the DARPA mDNS work I did six years ago. I believe that Bernard and
    his team are where they are because they had the patience and money to wait out a
    multi year IETF standardization effort. I ran out of money, Apple wanted to ship solutions.
    (i think)... the Apple specs are available as are the mDNS specs. neither is proprietary.

    that said, i think it is reasonable for the IETF to provide its imprinture on LLMNR as an IETF
    standards track activitiy for naming on a link-local environment. The work has not violated the
    processes, has met all the IETF criteria and should proceed. Pretty much a clear case of a protocol
    designed by committee. And its not like anyone will use it of course.
    Even Microsoft appears to have abandon it.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com