ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    The DoC and XXX | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 72 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    The ISOC.IETF Double Standard Continues Sans ICANN
    by Anonymous on Friday August 26 2005, @10:08AM (#16103)
    The ISOC.IETF Double Standard Continues Sans ICANN

    When CISCO needed a TLD for $50 WIFI Routers
    they selected .LAN, ICANN was not involved or
    if they were, people kept it very quiet.

    When Apple needs a TLD, they pick .LOCAL from
    the tree and now point to how widely it is used.
    ICANN was not involved. The ISOC and IETF of
    course help to promote it.

    http://files.multicastdns.org/draft-cheshir e-dnsext-multicastdns.txt

    "Note also that the special treatment of names ending in ".local." has
       been implemented in Macintosh computers since the days of Mac OS 9,
       and continues today in Mac OS X. There are also implementations for
       Linux and other platforms [dotlocal]. Operators setting up private
       internal networks ("intranets") are advised that their lives may be
       easier if they avoid using the suffix ".local." in names in their
       private internal DNS server. Alternative possibilities include:

          .intranet
          .internal
          .private
          .corp
          .home

    xxxyyyzzz

    The same thing happens with IP address space.
    The large companies take what they need and
    ICANN and IANA are not consulted or needed.
    RIRs are not paid by Apple, AT&T, HP or IBM
    for the massive allocations.

    It is one big double standard, or maybe one
    should call it two standards, one for the
    insiders and one for everyone else.

    It should not be surprising that this happens
    because developers and companies have to move
    forward to sell to the market. They would still
    be waiting to hear from Jon Postel and products
    would not be shipped to users.

    What is surprising is the number of creative
    ways the Internet Society and ICANN insiders
    have in attempting to explain away the double
    standard. It would appear to be more honest to
    say, "Yep, it exists, we do not intend to
    change, we are corrupt and like it that way."
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com