ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Don't Like the UN? How About GAC? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 84 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    U.S. Government Plan for XXX Calls for Edge Choice
    by Anonymous on Friday August 19 2005, @09:03AM (#15984)
    U.S. Government Plan for XXX Calls for Edge Choice

    The U.S. Government's plan for .XXX calls for
    the choice to be made on a person-by-person basis
    at "the edge" of the .NET.

    Various industry leaders are being called upon
    to provide more information on how that works.
    New.Net clearly has the edge in the edge solution.
    The ISOC's IAB is expected to publish an essay
    about end-to-end and edge solutions, reworked
    from their paper on .COM wild-card names.

    Centralized TLD management and centralized control
    of the Internet was NEVER supposed to be a
    feature of the Internet. Somehow, ICANN has
    managed to get that confused.

    With adults controlling their edge devices and
    their children's .NET access, the assumption is
    that they will also be able to control the
    OPT-IN selection of the .XXX TLD, as well as
    other TLDs. Those seeking .XXX content can seek
    it out. The U.S. Government does not have to
    be in a position of advertising it, which is
    what THEIR root-servers do. They advertise the
    likely location of TLDs, not all TLDs, just the
    ones the consensus of the American people select.

    This does not censor the .XXX TLD. It also does
    not stop ICANN from show-casing the "SPONSOR"
    of the .XXX zone. IF there really is a strong
    .XXX sponsor (and not a fabricated one) that
    sponsor would be stepping forward to focus on
    the objective of making .XXX more widely used.
    To date, ICANN has been unable and unwilling to
    produce a list of .XXX names that would be
    representative of the sponsor's selections.
    That makes the .XXX selection process suspect
    but does not stop consumers from making their
    selections known on a one-by-one basis in the
    Registry operated by New.Net and the SAME
    company that ICANN selected to run .XXX

    The U.S. Government's plan for .XXX calls for
    the choice to be made on a person-by-person basis
    at "the edge" of the .NET. Make your selections
    known and write to the U.S. Government and inform
    them of the names you have selected. That puts
    it in the public record.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com