| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Obscenity on the Internet
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 23 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
If you go back and read the GAC letter, it is pretty strange. It doesn't seem to say that other countries were THAT concerned.
"You may recall that during the session between the GAC and the Board in Luxembourg that some countries had expressed strong positions to the Board on this issue. In other GAC sessions, a number of other governments also expressed some concern with the potential introduction of this TLD." Yet a small mention in the Luxembourg GAC communique.
Is this really just the US? Is GAC a red-herring?
"sovereign governments are also free to write directly to ICANN about their specific concerns."
Sounds like this is an invitation to write now? Because they did not get off of their @ss@s before?
They must really be against it if ICANN has to beg them to write in!
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:Bravo
by Anonymous
|
| Starting Score: |
0 |
points |
| Moderation |
|
+1 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
1 |
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
