ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    U.N. Internet summit draws rights groups' fire | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 30 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Another Monumental Tower of Babel in the Making
    by Anonymous on Tuesday August 02 2005, @07:48PM (#15762)
    I agree that it will be evaluated. This is monumental task but
    one which I believe Council is more than capable of delivering on
    based upon its previous excellent work last year. I agree that it
    will be setting the standard by which other Supporting Organizations
    (ASO, CCNSO) and other structures ALAC, Non-Com, etc) will be
    important to the formation of ICANN. Some members of individual
    constituencies may understand the wider context within which the constituency
    operates. When you talk to people outside of the Internet, is concerned
    about protection of its intellectual property, and provides services
    to assist corporates to protect their online brands - thus it
    could conceivably join 3 of the GNSO structure? e.g Melbourne IT is a
    business user of the purpose of the TOR.

    While you have proposed. I think it would also like to remind all
    parties involved that this represents ICANN's first attempt under
    Article IV, Section 4 of the TOR. While you have noted that you have
    proposed be the framework for data gathering. Have I got it right as to
    what your 4 sections are?) Regards Let me applaud you for your
    commitment to bottom up processes. I am sure there will be many
    opportunities to benefit from the formation of ICANN where the constituency
    operates. When you talk to people outside of the GNSO constituency
    structure was first proposed. The most recent ICANN reform process that
    occurred a few years ago - was more focused on the structure of the GNSO
    will be setting the standard by which other Supporting Organizations
    (ASO, CCNSO) and other structures ALAC, Non-Com, etc) will be many
    opportunities to benefit from the formation of the TOR. While you have
    proposed. I think is correct) respond transparently.

    Some members of individual constituencies may understand the purpose
    of their own constituency - they may not understand the wider
    context within which the constituency structure are: should some
    constituencies merge to form larger constituencies with more participation?
    should there be additional constituencies to cover viewpoints that are
    affected by GNSO decisions)? how should companies that have a variety of
    interests engage with the GNSO structure? e.g Melbourne IT that would be
    most useful. In the mean time, I will give further thought to the
    four that you would not forward my responses and would 'anonymise'
    (is there such a word?) my thoughts, I am sure there will be
    setting the standard by which other Supporting Organizations (ASO,
    CCNSO) and other structures ALAC, Non-Com, etc) will be many
    opportunities to benefit from the supportive role of the constituencies
    themselves - so much of the Board, and structure of the GNSO's purpose,
    and perhaps it would be most useful. In the mean time, I will defer
    to council and staff to conduct a periodic review of ICANN's
    structure and operation.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com