| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
New .net agreement not etched in stone?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 3 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
The language that Dr. Cerf read from the Verisign statement was carefully worded. If I recall correctly (and the real-time transcription should be posted next week), Verisign said that it was open to discussions about the timing of the price cap rollbacks. Not much of a concession but interesting to see Verisign trying to help ICANN save face.
As far as I can tell, the general sense in Luxembourg is that a rollback in price caps is appropriate if we have real registry-level competition. Perhaps that's good news for .WEB and others.
-- Bret
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
| Starting Score: |
1 |
point |
| Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
2 |
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
