ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    WGIG Public Meeting considers Role of GAC in ICANN | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 45 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    the community does not need is any more half-baked
    by Anonymous on Tuesday June 21 2005, @04:13AM (#15644)
    http://www.internetstudies.org/networks/members/cr aimct/thesis/section5.htm

    Around the time of the Green Paper, Postel put together a “transition advisory group” of six highly influential members of the Internet engineering community. They were: Brian Carpenter, Program Director, Internet standards and technology, IBM, and Chair, IAB; Randy Bush, Director of network engineering, Verio, Board of Trustees member, ARIN, and Chair of the IETF’s DNS working group; David Farber, Professor, computer and information science and electrical engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Board of Trustees member, ISOC; Geoff Huston, Technical Manager for Telstra (formerly Telecom Australia) Internet, and President, Internet Society of Australia; John Klensin, Senior Data Architect, MCI Internet Engineering Organization, and Member, IAB; and Steve Wolff, Executive Director, Advanced Internet Initiatives, Cisco Systems, and former Director, NSFNET.

    These are the type of people whom Jon Postel consulted about changes in the Internet’s architecture, not the Internet community at large. It is interesting to note that despite the employment of several of these men at major Internet companies like IBM, Verio, MCI, Telstra, and Cisco, they almost all went there from posts with institutional networks of the non-commercial era. While one might see the names of these companies in the resumes of the leaders of the Internet technical community and come away with the impression that these individuals are representatives of something of an industry group, we must recall David Clark’s words about IETF members, for instance, “leaving their corporate allegiances at the door.” These individuals’ service to agencies like the IAB, IETF, and Postel’s transition advisory group, is in their personal capacity.

    Organizations like the IETF are industry bodies only to the extent that their members work for companies in the industry. Beyond that, the best interests of the Internet itself are paramount. This is particularly the case among the most well-known leaders. This appears to be something of a “code” among these individuals, alternately referred to as “Internet pioneers,” “Internet old-timers,” or the Internet’s “old guard.” Is it arrogance or a genuine belief that he and his fellow transition group members “know what’s best” for the Internet which leads John Klensin of MCI to say:

    One of the diseases of the Internet community is that there are a large number of individuals who say, “Well, everything would be all right if I were in charge.” One of the things the community does not need is any more half-baked proposals, which result in endless, pointless flaming about the details and who was consulted and who wasn’t.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   -1  
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com